Daniel Ovaska
Feb 25, 2021
visibility 3197
star star star star star
(1 votes)

Security issue with multiple package sources

Scenario

You are using a private nuget feed for a single package v 1.0.0 and a public nuget feed for the rest of your packages. An attacker can then upload a new package to public nuget feed using the same name as your private package but with a higher bug fix version v 1.0.1. Unless you have thought about this scenario your build server will look across all package sources and pick the most updated version (the faked 1.0.1 version on the public feed). So if you are using a private package source you are still not safe unless that is the only source you are using for your packages.

Solution

More detailed information can be found here about this vulnerability (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-24105) along with suggestions for how to mitigate the risks.

For high security scenarios:

  • Use one feed. If you have a private feed with internal packages, make that the only feed and add secure handling of public packages to that feed if you need. All projects should then use that one safe feed.
    https://azure.microsoft.com/sv-se/services/devops/artifacts/ is a good option that can deliver that if you don't want to create your own.

Additional mitigation:

  • Lock down your versions and make sure your build server can't update minor version automatically.
    Both npm and nuget can generate such a lock file easily that can then be used to force build server to use a specific version of all dependencies. Use nuget restore --lockedmode on CI servers to use the lock file.
  • Make sure one package can only be downloaded from one source.
    Use scope and npmrc file for npm to specify source per package. Use id prefix for nuget packages to block private packages from being uploaded to public feeds.

This is not an Episerver specific vulnerability but good to be aware of if security is important for your site.

I've added it to my security checklist for Episerver solutions, If you haven't gone through that for your site, I would suggest starting at the top and work your way down until you reach a decent level for your security requirements. 

Stay safe, don't get hacked! Happy coding!

Feb 25, 2021

Comments

error Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Optimizely Graph - Provisioning, User Management & Developer Instances

Upgrading to Optimizely CMS 13 marks a major architectural shift as Optimizely Graph takes over as the central query and delivery engine, retiring...

Scott Reed | Sep 28, 2026

An (unofficial) MCP server for Optimizely Data Platform (ODP)

I wanted to ask Claude some questions about session setup data in Optimizely Data Platform (ODP) without writing GraphQL every time. There's no...

Jacob Pretorius | Sep 28, 2026

Admin UI for Optimizely SaaS CMS Integrations Without Extra Tools: Preview-Based Dashboards, OCP UI Extensions and Keeping Them Private

On PaaS we extended the CMS UI with custom admin panels; SaaS CMS has no such hooks. Here is a workaround: an admin UI for external content...

Szymon Uryga | Sep 27, 2026 |

Personalisation in CMS 13 when you go headless: variations in the CMS, decisions in Experimentation

Back in February I wrote about personalisation in CMS 13 using Audiences . Everything in that post still holds, with one condition I should have ma...

Minesh Shah (Netcel) | Sep 24, 2026